Bush's Veto For Stem Cell Research?

Was it right? My Opinion:


My father has been living with MS for more than 5 years. Auto-immue diseases run in our family and stem cell research would really help. I took his veto very personall and frankly I'm pissed off. And to top things off, in CA we have I think 3 billion dollars that are supposed to be used for stem cell research under consideration in court. When did medical research every become an issue of morals? Letting someone die doesn't sound like following morals at all.





What are your opinons?

Bush's Veto For Stem Cell Research?
As usual, Bush does as he likes. When he came to office he backtracked on all the Kyoto protocols which was being put in place by other developed countries to save the Earth.





Now he's vetoing stem cell research just because it against his beliefs.





He has never done anything that is of the best interests of the majority public. He has always in favour of the few that is close to him.
Reply:There has been documented data that the blood, and stem cells used from cord blood is helpful, to M.S. patients. When a Child is born. The problem is that the procedure has to be set up in advance, so the process can be done.





God Bless Your Dad and You Report Abuse

Reply:I think the veto of the bill is stupid.because when it comes to war ,killing innocent people to successfully kill other people is a perfectly exceptional thing.but when it comes to saveing lives without taking anything he puts his foot down.Collateral damage is fine when your takeing lives..but not when your saveing them.Bush is a douche.Plane and simple.
Reply:Don't blame Mr Busch, he is our president and do fulfill the will of the voters who might have voted for him. It is called democracy.
Reply:No it wasn't right because while Gov. of Texas he let hundreds die in prison death penalty.


But the reason he used was saying that all life is precious. That is being two-faced either save all lives or don't.





Murder is murder whether it's a cell or an evil adult. We should rise above.
Reply:You are 100% right!! There is alot that Stem Cell can do for alot of people...they have even said they can find more cures for Cancer....Bush was wrong in doing that...
Reply:Can you say Theocracy? Blame the "conservative Christians" for the utter stupidity of our president.





I believe in Christ but I also believe in separation of church and state so did our founding forefathers.
Reply:It's not about morals, it's about President Shrub trying to look good to the religious wackos.





Bush is trying to impose his religious beliefs on everyone. The bible thumpers are followers who do whatever the leader does, so it makes it easier for Bush to get away with what he's been doing in our name.





Whatever happened to separation of church and state? (And before some religious wacko says there's no such thing, try actually reading the entire constitution and bill of rights first...the first people in the English colonies were fleeing the religious impostions of the English king...trying to win freedom from another religion. The Founding Fathers of our nation wanted that to never happen in this country, yet it is happening.)





To all of the christians who think bush is some kind of godsend...how would you like it if someday in the near future, another president imposed his religion on the country, but it wasn't YOURS?





It's sad that Bushwacker used his vewwy fusst veto on something religion-driven. He should have been focusing on the good such research would do.
Reply:i think it was wrong,stem cell research can prevent and cure diseases its useful...i bet if one of bush's parents had a disease he would have had a second thought

home teeth cleaning